Home/LinksComments...Campaign news...Latest news ...Hunting / ShootingFarming and live exportsAnimals for entertainment / circus / bullfightingGeneral A/R news...

**Thu 02 Sep 10**
MEMOIRS - TONY BLAIR CHEERFULLY CONFESSES,
AS IF IT WERE ALL SOMETHING TO SMIRK ABOUT

Comments below from WAAC's patron Brian May

Well, seeing Tony Blair's Memoirs in the news has jerked me out my silence.

Reading this stuff has disgusted me so much I think I will have to write my own memoirs.

I have to say that the biggest disappointment in my limited experience of politics is Tony Blair.

When he came to power, how we all smiled and sighed with relief ... "At last, a decent, nice man, an ordinary man, a man who has a boyish innocent charm, even plays the guitar, and is obviously much too down-to-Earth to indulge in the kind of Empire-building and skullduggery that has characterised politicians to us in the recent past". I met him, early on, excited, and shook hands with him ... full of hope that this man would do the decent thing in all circumstances. A bunch of photographers gathered around to record the moment.

A few years later, I found myself beside him at the launch of a scheme (half-baked, as it turned out) which was going to empower people to make as much mess and pollution in the world as they liked, as long as they purchased units of "cool", to compensate. Blair and his mates had endorsed this scheme, and Tony himself had just made an excellent speech, convincing us all that here was something which was going to banish the terrible threat of Global Warming in the twinkling of an eye. He had come over to say hello, and presented, as before, a very pleasant and affable face. This time, as I noticed a swarm of photographers gathering, a feeling of extreme unease crept over me. If I shook hands with this man now, smiling as one does at a social occasion if one is reasonably polite, the photo would be there for all time, apparently saying "Here's Brian May publicly endorsing a man and his works ... including illegally and immorally invading a virtually defenceless country, smashing its culture and its infrastructure, and causing the unnecessary death of thousands of men, women and children." I could not in conscience do that. So I said something like "Hello - excellent speech" and did not take the required step forwards; this allowed about half a dozen delegates to step forward in my place, who obviously WANTED to have their picture taken with Prime Minister Blair. There is no political figure in my lifetime in whom I had had more hope and trust, and in whom I felt such a bitter disappointment.

Of course, I had also noticed many other things along the way about our nice Prime Minister which looked suspect, including the fact that he disappeared at the time the vote was being held on the introduction of the Hunting Ban - which to me at the time seemed a rather cowardly omission on his part.

There's a load more stuff. But I suppose I nursed the hope that, in fact, Tony had taken part in the invasion of Iraq as a means of moderating the warmonger Bush. And that he actually had some very important reason to be elsewhere when the whole future of Britain's wild animals was being determined. And ...

Well, the Blair Memoirs certainly scotched all that. Very cleverly, of course, Tony has announced his intention to give away the royalties of his book to help the veterans and dependents of the Iraq war. Cleverly? I am a writer too ... and I can tell you if you are not Harry Potter it is not a very lucrative profession .. so, well, forgive me, but I am not the first to point out that the relatively small amount of money he would have made from the book might be seen as a small price to pay to secure his precious 'legacy'.

Remorse? I don't see it. I don't feel it, reading the book.

And then there is his light-hearted account of the fox-hunting issue. This I found disgusting, not just because his behaviour was a betrayal of hundreds of thousands of our beautiful wild creatures, but because, even by his own admission, he sabotaged his own government's bill. He paid lip-service to a cause which he did not believe in, and seems smugly proud of the fact that he ended up with a situation which pleased no-one. Even if he had come out and said "Look, I've changed my mind - I no longer believe in this act" one could have a shred of respect for him. But no; the book describes how he desperately wriggled, and squirmed, and tried to find a way of backing out without being seen to lose face. A man so desperate to please everyone and to be thought a hero, he took the cowardly way out ... simply turned his back at the last minute. It's so lame. He relates it in a rather jocular, condescending way ... as if it were some kind of silly game, rather than about the suffering of animals.

But the most shameful part is yet to come. Having tried to make his own legislation ineffective (and failed even at that), he did something so disgraceful, that the true essence of the man leaks through.

So, as the final below-the belt blow to the hopes of thousands of caring individuals who had spent years of their energies trying to put fox-hunting where it belongs, alongside Slavery, Bear-Baiting, and burning witches at the stake ... he robbed his own police force of the balls to enforce the law properly.

I found all this so shocking I could hardly speak for most of today, going about my business. I guess someone like Tony Blair thinks that, like Richard Nixon, he can come out and confess his lameness and dishonesty because it's all in the past, and we will love him anyway - it wasn't really serious, was it? It all turned out fine, right?

But here was a man going around telling the world he supported a cause, but actually hiding the truth - that his belief was gone, and he was going to try to torpedo any good effect that might come out of the crusade to get a better deal for animals. No remorse for the fox-cubs who are this moment being fed alive to packs of trainee hounds, to give them the taste of blood. But would you expect remorse for this from someone who can't even express remorse for causing the loss of thousands of innocent human lives? How silly of me ... they're only animals, right? ... and this country cares too much about animals, right?

Yes, Blair's Prime Ministership is in the past. But who could ever trust a man like that again?

Brian


From Chris Gale re Tony Blairs sabotage of the hunting act
As a Labour party member and animal welfare campaigner I am quite appalled by the stand taken by Tony Blair as revealed his book published today. Those of us inside the party need to speak up strongly for the ban and the values it represents and make it clear that Mr Blair's appalling remarks are not supported by the majority of Labour members or the country at large.Many of us a long time ago knew that Blair never wanted the ban but for him to make these remarks in this high profile book just weeks before a possible vote on repeal is quite dreadful.
It will give the hunters a huge boost.

Online reports of the content of the book show that Mr Blair deliberately set out to sabotage the Hunting Act having never wanted it in the first place:

Mr Blair said he deliberately sabotaged the 2004 Hunting Act to ensure there were enough loopholes to allow hunting to continue.

  • He also told then-Home Office minister Hazel Blears to steer police away from enforcing the law.
  • Mr Blair said he also had a bet with Prince Charles that fox hunting would continue

During a trip to Italy he spoke to the mistress of a hunt near Oxford he realised banning hunting was the 'wrong thing to do.'

"She took me calmly and persuasively through what they did, the jobs that were dependent on it, the social contribution of keeping the hunt and the social consequence of banning it and did it with an effect that completely convinced me," Mr Blair said.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have sent the following letter to various papers:

 Tony Blair (report 1 Sept) says he regrets the ban on hunting with dogs. The ban, which has huge public support,outlawed the vicious so-called sports of hare coursing, fox hunting and stag hunting.Mr Blair then goes on to accuse Gordon Brown of lacking emotional intelligence.By saying banning cruelty for fun was the wrong thing to do I think it is quite clear who is lacking in emotional intelligence and it certainly is not Gordon Brown.
Chris Gale



Many of us fighting for animals knew early on that Tony Blair was a liar and a traitor - not just to his own party but the many people who voted for him on the promise of a hunt ban.  And now we have the truth in his own biography.

Blair mixed with hunters and he now tells the world that he never wanted the ban on fox hunting, infact when he could not control the passage of the act - he made damn sure there were enough loopholes to allow rich and cruel hunts to continue. And just to reinforce this - he told Hazel Blears to steer the police away from enforcing the law.

Blair even wrote that the ban was “a masterly British compromise, that left enough loopholes to allow hunting to continue, provided certain steps were taken to avoid cruelty when the fox is killed.” What on earth is he talking about? How can cruelty to a fox being killed by dogs be avoided? Would Blair like that kind of death for himself? And why did he ignore the Burn's Report that concluded that foxes were only a minor nuisance and so did not deserve being tormented to a horrible end for the gratification the few?

Blair's actions were tantamount to corruption on a level that makes politics just about as filthy as it's possible to get. In other words, war monger and liar Tony Blair does not just have the blood of countless men, women and children on his hands, he also has the suffering of many defenceless animals too!.

This evil politician betrayed good people and for this he will never be forgiven and so why is he now being made a Lord when the majority in this country despises him?

If ever there was a time for politicians to clean up  their act and get some compassion on the agenda, it's now!.

Judi


Sealand councillor raises fox concerns

CONCERNS have been raised over the increasing number of foxes roaming around Sealand.

Cllr Chris Jones contacted the Chronicle after Flintshire County Council told her its pest control section does not deal with foxes.

She was also told by the Countryside Council for Wales it is not responsible for controlling the vermin either.

“I don’t know who to turn to,” said Cllr Jones, who lives in Welsh Road.

She said the foxes appear to have set up home at off Sandy Lane, near the old RAF site and the playing fields.

“They’re coming onto the estates at night and scavenging in bins for food,” she said.

“They’re breeding and we’re getting over-run – something needs to be done.”

Residents fear foxes have killed cats in the area and Cllr Jones is also concerned children playing on the fields during the summer could get hurt if they approach the animals.




From: mike jones <jonahmikejp@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "waac@rocketmail.com" <waac@rocketmail.com>
Sent: Thu, 26 August, 2010 16:16:29
Subject:

Dear Judi

I have this evening read a letter from youself in the Flintshire Chronicle titled 'Give Foxes a chance', Well let me introduce myself I am Cllr Christine Jones who who claim is a 'hunt loving Cllr'

I would like to set the record straight and also ask you how you thought you had the right to make these Liabelous comments about me. I have never been so insulted in my life! I am a long serving member of the Labour Party and I am totally against fox hunting and that is on a very personal level also! The idea of killing for sport disgusts me and also my husband and two daughters. All of which are members of various animal rights and support groups! If you had done your homework before writing this disgusting letter you would have known as an elected member of this ward I was the voice of my residents on this matter and their concerns were regarding foxes on a play area not a personal attack on foxes! I have infact had a resident fox in my area for years and myself, family and other residents make sure it is very well protected.

I have never been so insulted and I would like a written apology in next week's  Chronicle

You can make an appointment to meet me and also my family who you have also insulted because of this letter (my Daughter is a Community Councillor and the most anti animal cruelty person you will ever meet)

My number to make the appointment is 01244 811556

Regards

Cllr Christine Jones

What do you think? Do you think Councillor Christine Jones cares about foxes?  And if as Mrs Jones says she cares about foxes, what exactly is it that she wants done about these animals? After all, foxes are territorial and if killed will soon be replaced by another fox family. I will be asking this public servant in the near future.
Judi

YouTube Help Centre | email options | report spam

EVIL CONTACTS WAAC'S ROCKET MAIL ADDRESS


Tallyho1111
has replied to your comment on Hunting Song - The Foxhunter:
Believe me, we are not usally violent (except to animals or anyone who gets in our way) - you just keep off our turf! We dont start turning up at your football matches so keep away from us. Who do you think you are insulting us? The fact is you would s**t yourself if you were to find yourself defenceless in a volatile situation. Just knock on a fox hunters door and we will show you!

Sounds like a threat to me? Typical of bloodthirsty thugs who get pleasure tormenting defenceless animals to death.
Incidentally, I hate football, I like hill walking but prefer not to come across evil people getting pleasure from torturing animals to death. Plus who the hell gave you the right to say who enters the countryside - do you own it? you're probably a townie too, most evil terrier-men and hunters usually are!
Judi


Waac received this email from a colleague and thought it deserved attention.

Could you PLEASE put out an appeal on your website for donations to Hen Heaven.
 
I don't quite know how to describe this place.  It's an utter tip but is run by Linda, the most dedicated person I know.  She has 200 chickens and cockerels and 60 turkeys,  nearly all of whom are crowded into a grotty big building, although with enough space to get around, procreate and seemingly enjoy themselves.  The reason they are indoors is because the place is replete with foxes who, in the past, when Linda had the birds outside, kept killing them.  She has been running this place virtually on her own for about 20 years.  She has no house but sleeps in a horrid old van. she has been saving for fourteen years for a strong, high fence to be erected.  This will cost £33,000 but she has only reached £16,000.
 
Mike and I went to help out with odd jobs yesterday and we couldn't believe the state of the place.  Linda is about to go into hospital for a very serious operation and will be unable to see her precious birds for about three weeks.  She is having horrendous things done to her jaw and may be unable to speak for a while and certainly will be unable to eat.    The birds are beautiful and loved.  I especially adored the wonderful turkeys who are so soft to stroke.
 
When I think of all the money floating around in this country it makes me so mad that this fantastic woman is struggling with all her might to look after these rescued birds.  Linda used to be a sab but can no longer run.  She is the epitome of the dedicated, heroic AR person and is, of course, a vegan.
 
Can you please use all your persuasive powers to drum up money for her.  If we had money we would put in a few thousand ourselves.  She said that a few years ago Paul McCartney was made to pull down a solid wooden lodge he had built in his garden (by the council).  She wrote and asked him if he would donate it to Hen Heaven.  Guess what?  She didn't even receive a reply.  Mind you, I doubt if he ever gets to read the letters people write to him.
 
The address is Hen Heaven, Squirrels Farm, Stonepit Lane, Henfield, West Sussex.  It would be wonderful if cheques came rolling in.
 
Lots of love
 
Naomi and Mike xx 

 thought you might be interested in the work of internationally renowned artist Ruth Norbury. Ruth specialises in animal rights issues and has recently produced a piece about the badger cull in Wales .

Ruth is currently also running a competition to win one of her embroideries with 20% of the profits going towards an animal rescue group.

Please visit www.ruthnorbury.com to take a look

PLEASE SIGN AND CIRCULATE TO THE MOON AND BACK – THIS WOMAN MUST BE PUNISHED !!!! 


Subject: Fw: Catherine wants you to take action on "JUSTICE FOR MIMI ... PREGNANT - DOUSED WITH GASOLINE"!
 
 
 
OMG how terrible. I am lost for words.
 
 
 
 
Subject: Catherine wants you to take action on "JUSTICE FOR MIMI ... PREGNANT - DOUSED WITH GASOLINE"!
 
Catherine Cardozo has just read and signed the petition: JUSTICE FOR MIMI ... PREGNANT - DOUSED WITH GASOLINEYou can view this petition at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/tell-a-friend/7603861Message from Catherine Cardozo:
-----
Hi, I signed the petition "JUSTICE FOR MIMI ... PREGNANT - DOUSED WITH GASOLINE". I'm asking you to sign this petition to help us reach our goal of 5,000 signatures. I care deeply about this cause, and I hope you will support our efforts.----- ThePetitionSite.com provides tools and empowers individuals to make a difference and effect positive change through online activism. Get connected with the causes you care about, take action to make the world a better place, and start your own petition at http://www.ThePetitionSite.com!ThePetitionSite.com is powered by Care2, the largest and most trusted information and action site for people who care to make a difference in their lives and the world. www.care2.com

TO SEE LOVELY VIDEO OF URBAN FOXES visit TONYWILDLIFE's channel


MESSAGE FROM BRAZILIAN ROCK MUSICIAN, JOEY SUMMER

Hi, Judi. How's it going? I hope everything's fine there!
My album was released this june18 and I put the address of your site in the booklet of the CD. I would like to send you a copy of the album!
Also, I was interviewed by the german magazine READY 2 ROCK and the interview will be available in its next edition early august, I think.
Here is the part of the interview that I spoken my point of view regarding the animal rights issues and about your beautiful work on it!
Ps: The interview will be translated and published in german. ( http://www.ready-2-rock.de/index.html )

"9-You are very dedicated to animal protection projects. Please tell me about this projects. What kind of projects are this and how did you take notice of the topic? What is your special concern about that?

JS- Man, thank you for asking, I really love when people aske me about it. I just love animals and I have a deep respect for all kind of living creature of God. If I do not understand them, I try to respect them even more. Recently I spent to support a beautiful campaign promoted by Judi Hewitt named "Wales Against The Animal Cruelty" (www.walesagainstanimalcruelty.org.uk) and it's also supported by Brian May, from Queen band and his fondation SAVE ME (against fox hunting). But I always did my part, anonymously. I was created in a small town and my parents owned a small ranch with a few horses. I learned in my very early days about the meaning of love and compassion for any kind of life. We must respect life if we want to be respected for the life. This is my religion. Unless we get learn how to love the animals that need us to provide them some quality of life, once we already insert them into our society, we never will find peace for our hearts and souls and the world peace, so dreamed for all, will be only a fair tale that never will happen. Because it's about the human being. Wales Against Animal Cruelty, fight, among other animal rights, against the terrible situation regarding  the fox hunting. It's unacceptable that in modern society that we live today, there is still some space for traditions of torture involving animals that have their own rights to live. All for the men's pleasure and fun! Recently I took note of a trophy hunter who killed the last male desert lion in Namibia. This especial species will be eradicated from our world and our children will probably never have the chance to know how they were or to learn how they lived. This seems to me kinda monstrous. The man who preaches the peace in the world, kill in a cold blood way, the life that surrounds him. It works like this: Where there is reasonable cause to defend the right to life, I go there and try to do my part. It's not that much, I know. Wish I could do more, but it's a start! "

Judi, just for you to know, I am really missing my sweet VICTORIA yet, I can't wake up in the morning without a deepest feeling of her in every where, all around. It's tough!

But my  schedule has kept me involved in lot of work, and it helps sometimes!

Well my dear, Judi. Have a great time and I wish you all the best, peace, and love!

Cheers,

/Joey


Many thanks Joey,  for spreading the word throughout the world for defenceless animals.
As for your beautiful Victoria - she will never leave your side, love is the most powerful emotion of all - it unites all who embrace it, be they human or animal. I believe it is why we are here, to bring light to the world!
Emotions such as hatred cannot last - they wither and die in this life along with those which feed on them!. 

Good luck with your latest album.
Judixx

Comments needed on this American article, he talks usual nonsense about 'liberty'.
Note his last sentence,'possibly I will even join in the fray. Though if I do, I shall ride at the back of the hunt. I would not want to incite a dog to carnage.'

OPEN LETTER TO STEVE CROSBY - AREA MANAGER OF THE CLOGAENOG FOREST

Dear Mr Crosby, (Area Manager, North Wales Area Office)
I sent the following email (appeal) some weeks ago and have not received any acknowledgment. I am of course appealing against the letter you sent to me, since it does not satisfy my concerns regarding the disturbing case of a fox we found mutilated by dogs in the Clogaenog. I was also very concerned that Mr Ellis, your employee and a former fox hunter, has been given the role of monitoring fox hunting in the area. My impression of Mr Irwin Ellis, after speaking with him, was that he was very biased in favour of the hunters. To my mind, giving Mr Ellis the job of overseeing fox hunting in the area was a bit like putting a bank robber in charge of the bank. His explanation of how hunts operate was a very weak one and it was one that I'm sure he hoped I would swallow. Just like Mr Ellis, I too have seen many gunpacks operate, but I was never on some jolly to see foxes killed, I was there by accident, trying to enjoy a relaxing walk.
Mr Ellis whole attitude towards me was to say the least, aggressive. He tried to tell me that he understood how fox hunts operate and that hounds are naturally aggressive (which may be true to a point) but the fact is young hounds like all dogs vary in their aggressiveness and some will show less aptitude to kill than others which is why they need to be trained up to be brutal in order to be more effective when hunting. See the following quote from a hunt master of the Beaufort hunt. "Never lose sight of the fact that one really well-beaten cub killed fair and square is worth half a dozen fresh ones killed the moment they are found without hounds having to set themselves to the task. It is essential that hounds should have their blood up and learn to be savage with their fox before he is killed."
So as you can see from the above quote, Mr Ellis was quite wrong to suggest that hunts use their integrity when killing foxes. All hunters do is use the fox in some grim game of seek and shoot. Never mind that many will be injured and go off to die a slow and lingering death (of infection) while others are riddled with shot, then caught and finished off by hounds. And for what? So that these so called hunters can bolster their flagging ego's?
My hope is that after this horrific fox killing, serious precautions are now being under taken by the FC, to prevent another fox suffering the same terrible tortured death.
I look forward to your reply.
Yours Faithfully,
Judi Hewitt

ANIMAL HATERS COMMENTS ON YOUTUBE RE SONG FOR THE FOXES.
 

E4A2010 has made a comment on SONG - For The foxes:

Dear Judi

I have read the lies and untruths posted on your website and am very saddened that you misinform people about how wildlife management is undertaken in the UK. I will now monitor your website on a semi regular basis on behalf of Education 4 Antis. An organisation dedicated to helping prevent "people haters" masquerading as "animal lovers" publishing lies about hunting in an attempt to seek pres attention for nothing more than personal gain.

AND HERE'S ANOTHER EMAIL FROM ANOTHER 'CARING' SHOOTER, I PRESUME!

jarcave
has made a comment on SONG - For The foxes:
Hi mate. I found this from a link in the forum. Sanctimonious, self promoting bull **** if ever there was! Don't worry Judi, the fox won't have been tied down. Many fox shooters string them up for farmers and landowners to see that they have been sucessfull. It won't have suffered as you suggested.

And my reply to anonymous critics....

For you say that this fox didn't suffer means you think you know something - so what do you know about this incident?
It might interest you to know that this fox showed no sign of gun shot wounds to her upper body or head, so if she had been shot, then it would have been a very bad shot, and her death slow and agonising. How would you feel if you were shot in the guts? Screaming I imagine! Well this little vixens lower body was too bloodied to see any shot, but I was assured by the CSI who was with me at the time she was found that this little fox had not been shot. She did however show signs of having been disembowelled by dogs because of the tearing away of flesh and her free back leg.  And to answer your question about this fox having been strung up to show the farmer what a good boy the shooter was - wrong! This fox had been hidden where no farmer would have found her. She was placed carefully well away to the side of a public footpath. We only knew she was there because of the smell of death - it was a warm day. 
Plus if she had been predated on after death there would have been very little blood. The fact her lower body had been gutted, leaving a mass of dark congealed blood where her intestines would have been, and the fact her left back leg had been ripped off, all point to her having received her terrible injuries while she was still alive. Bleeding only occurs when the victim is still alive, be they human or animal. I also had some info from a Ministry Vet from Cardiff, who sat at a government meeting and heard a hunt master admit that hunts sometimes tie up the leg of a fox and dangle it from a tree to train young hounds. My Vet confidante said the whole room sat in total silence after that!.
So if you think I exposed this cruelty for some sick publicity stunt then you are sadly mistaken. The only people I freely admit to disliking are animal abusers - are you one?
I seek publicity to highlight the disgusting way animals are abused for entertainment by a minority of people that get perverted pleasure from hurting them. My God, what the hell is wrong with you people?
Why can't you care about animals instead of abusing them for entertainment? What did they ever do to you? And please do not tell me that shooters help farmers out of the goodness of their hearts - they don't have any goodness, because if they did, they would see that they were using helpless animals as living targets to bolster their flagging ego's and as an excuse to use their treasured weaponry.....

HELP WENDY WITH HER CAMPAIGN TO STOP ANIMAL CRUELTY ON THE SHOW 'I'M A CELEBRITY, GET ME OUT OF HERE'. 

My name is Wendy J Wells, l am writing to you as l feel and hope you would be interested (and hopefully willing to help) in my quest against certain animal cruelty conditions on the ITV programmes lm a celebrity get me out of here and The Door.
 While I have no objection to the actual programmes, in fact with regard to the I.A.C.G.M.O.O.H. programme sticking a bunch of pampered celebrities into a dirty jungle with no agents or luxuries IS quite funny, BUT... I AM disgusted at the continual escalating abuse this programme and their pilot 2part programme The Door is allowed to carry out against the various animals used in both programmes, most especially the arthropod species (insects) which are squashed, or eaten by their thousands over the course of the series, purely for "entertainment" purposes with little if any regard that arthropods are just as important in the world as any other kind of animal, in fact if we had no arthropods in this world we would not survive.
    l know that there are certain countries that eat insects of different types on a daily basis but this is done as part of their culture or diet not for the purpose of so called "entertainment", l personally don't find it entertaining l find it quite upsetting that animals can be treated so cruelly and with virtually no respect.
   Both programmes are made by Granada Productions who have an office facility at ITV studios in London, after numerous emails, letters and phone calls to both ITV and Granada had got me no where l decided to protest outside the studios in London in Feb. of this year, it wasn't to be one of my better ideas as it was freezing cold, very wet and extremely uncomfortable for the week l was there.
   But I was eventually given a piece of ITV headed paper and told that this was the email address of the executive producer of  Im a celebrity  (The Door hadn't been aired at that time) and that they had requested that I go home and email them what problems I had with Im a celeb and what I wanted to have happen.
 I therefor agreed to comply with the request and went home to email her and explained how I felt regards to the way animals were treated on Im a celeb and requested a meeting with at least one or two of the producers of the programme, despite the fact that she had requested and was expecting my email she still took almost 3weeks to reply, even then it seemed to be a basic orchestrated reply saying how they had animal welfare people like the new south wales S.P.C.A. and insect wranglers ( no, I have no idea what insect wranglers are) at the site where "bushtucker trials" were performed etc and how they did everything possible to be aware of the animals welfare's each time.
  I tried asking how it was in the insects welfare's to be squashed or eaten alive or in the baby crocs welfare's to have their mouths taped up for periods of time for "trials" but got no reply so decided to resume my protest back outside the ITV studios, especially when a few days after the reply the ITV showed a 2part pilot show by the same company called The Door which was filmed in the uk and presented by Chris Tarrant who hypocritically happens to be a patron of a wildlife sanctuary and rescue centre in Surrey??.
  As with the protest in February I resumed my protest on the 17th of May and stayed outside the studios in London in a tent until the 17th of June when I was sent an email offering me a meeting with the top executive of both programmes, I lost quite a bit of weight and suffered quite badly during my ordeal but my determination never faltered.
   At the meeting on the 29th June I did my very best to persuade the three producers of the programmes that it was immoral and cruel to continue abusing the animals used in the two programmes, I also showed them the evidence to prove that this wasn't just my views on this including over 1000 signatures that l had gathered over the two protests, plus a number of emails in support of what l was trying to do including some from a number of animal welfare organisations.
Despite all this evidence they seemed steadfast in their ideas that they were within the guidelines for animal use and tv acceptance, they have given me until the end of Friday the 9th to forward any remaining emails, signatures, etc. to them before they make a definite decision, but as it stands at the moment its not looking good so l am desperately looking for help in trying to make them change their views and am begging for your help in achieving this so as to stop this awful treatment of animals in these programmes, including taping mouths of baby crocs, or in the case of The Door taunting dogs in cages with food tied to celebs crawling outside of the cages out of their reach. celebs being made to ride horses down very deep ravines +across a river with a fast currant and water up to the horses backs all but one of the celebs with virtually no experience of horse riding and only basic instructions after having barely recovered from jumping out of a plane.( l can email you more of the things l disagree with in a further email if requested) 
  Please help me with your expertise and experience so that my two gruelling protests totalling 6+ weeks won't be for nothing and will stop these awful uses of animals for so called "entertainment" can be stopped.
  Should you wish to contact me direct my phone number is 07789643916 thank you for sparing the time to read this I'm sorry it was a bit long but I was trying to show the background to what I've done so far.
    I do hope you can help me in some way, I shall keep on with this venture of mine until I succeed in stopping this cruelty, which also gives impressionable, vulnerable children the message that animals can be used in this way as long as its "entertaining," its not entertaining its cruel and wrong.
 l have copy pasted links to my facebook group page, the newspapers that ran an article on me plus a link to info re The Door.
                                                    best wishes
                                                        Wendy
supported so far by
Buglife    Animal Aid    Scotland for Animals  Advocates for Animals   Born Free Foundation   World Horse Welfare   Remus   Animal Concern   Animals Count   Noahs Ark   B.E.N.H.S   I.S.A.R
 and lastly the South London press    http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/tn/News.cfm?id=19894&headline=Animal%20lover%20protests%20in%20Southwark

Hi Wendy,
Any way we can help you with this sickening abuse for entertainment is of course without question. I will put the word around via WAAC's website
I will put your email up on the comments page. Let me know what further assistance we can be? Obviously, we must all write to the producers to complain about the fact they use animals in cruel ways for sensationalism. 
Perhaps we should also contact the SPCA to tell them that this programme tries to persuade the public that animals are disgusting things to be afraid of - in other words, it gives the impression that animals can be abused because many are not nice. This programme does nothing to educate, it actually does the opposite.
Take care,
Judi
 

OPEN LETTER TO CHRIS RUANE (LABOUR) MP FOR VALE OF CLWYD.
  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/countryside/7870147/Hunt-supporters-offer-compromise-deal-to-try-and-overturn-ban.html

Dear Chris (Ruane),
What are you going to do about countering what Labour Peer Lord Donaghue is saying? He appears to be agreeing with the Tories on the hunting issue. There is no way killing with dogs can be made less cruel - hunting with dogs by its very nature, is cruel!
T
he only way to stop the cruelty is to force hunts to take up drag hunting, not the tired excuse they call trail hunting which they currently use to kill foxes.
But the idea that this Labour Peer is agreeing with the Tories turns my stomach. I didn't work myself into the ground to see hunting brought back by the back door.
Plus even if hunting could be made less cruel and believe me there is no way that it can be - who's going to enforce it? In other words, who's going to police it? Hunting is barbaric! Chris, I've witnessed foxes killed by hounds and it was the most terrible experience of my life. 
If Labour give in to the Tories on this issue, it will be the last straw for many people in this country. Believe me Chris, the only reason Labour were not completely destroyed was because a hell of a lot of the public did not want hunting brought back by the Tories. Labours only saving grace in the last election was the hunting act. It is something for Labour to be truly proud of. If Labour MP's do the dirty on the public on this issue then it will too much to bare for a lot of people in this country. I for one will campaign like fury to stop any party in North Wales that agrees with hunting, and who blindly follows the filthy Tory line. Don't betray the animals Chris, don't let that snake in the grass Donaghue destroy what's left of the Labour Party.
Labour has a chance to put things right with the public. I personally admire all the hard work you've done in the Vale of Clwyd and your commitment to the hunting act. All we are asking is that you use your voice to speak on our behalf to ensure the ban on hunting stays in place. Then when the public has come to its senses and tired of the CamClegg twins, Labour can then smash illegal hunts into the ground. Roll on the day!
Sincerely,
Judi (Hewitt)

DAILY MAIL ACCUSES ALL ANIMAL RIGHTS OF MAKING THREATS AND BEING ON BENEFITS...

Check out the following article - looks like it was written by a complete nutter!! Plus no mention of the fact Nick Koupparis works for the film company that did the Panorama programme. Talk about seeking publicity!.You would think that if the Koupparis family were so bothered by animal rights activists they would shy away from the public eye - obviously they are enjoying all the attention. Will it ever end!. It's an insult to all those poor kids who were killed by dogs but who never got the press coverage the Koupparis family received! The press are sicker than they have ever been - can they stoop any lower. Lots of people endure insults in their lives, it's the nature of people unfortunately. And while I don't condone insults, I don't believe for a minute that Nick and Pauline Koupparis were threatened. 
True animal rights folk hold all life sacred, even animal abusers. 
Meanwhile, we must try to boycott the national papers until they get a sense of decency and stop persecuting our beloved foxes and those of us fighting for an end to animal abuse.
But the papers, not content with demonising and encouraging the killing of frightened little foxes have now turned their attention to animal rights, accusing all of us of being shits, of being on benefits, of being the scum of the earth! I wouldn't put it past pro-hunt supporters or the pro-hunt press to post sick comments on facebook themselves in the hope that it might cast decent animal rights campaigners in a bad light - this is after all, a war!. And the kind of people that delight in the torture of animals would not stop at posting horrible comments on the internet. Problem is, the thick and rotten to the core reporters in 2010 want to believe that animal rights are terrorists. Have you noticed that when anti-hunt monitors get beaten up by hunt thugs they are largely ignored by the press, or doubt is cast over their claims. And just to rub salt in a wound, nothing is done to the perpetrators in the courts.    
Ask the papers who they think we are and you will be told that we are either bunny huggers or terrorists. The only name they place on us that does not offend me, is the name 'animals'. These dishonest people don't even have the intelligence to realise that only mankind is deliberately cruel?
Our fight for animals must be intensified - the more evil that tries to cast a slur on our good work, the harder we must fight!
Remember, first they ignore us, then they laugh at us, then they fight us, then we win.!
Judi


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1291353/The-animal-rights-fanatics-benefits-left-fox-attack-family-needing-police-protection.html

SICK ACCUSATION FROM HUNT SUPPORTER - in local paper.

CONSPIRACY. My remarks are in in red.
LAST week Mrs Hewitt used the RSPCA and a forensic examiner to back up her fantasy over how this fox died. These so called experts could not actually see that this was an adult vixen and not a cub. (under my instruction, this particular newspaper never called the fox a cub) There is no evidence to suggest this fox was attacked by hounds but a discussion and conclusion which Mrs Hewitt wanted to believe.
I have my own idea of what might have happened. Maybe an animal rights activist found a dead fox and seeing an opportunity ties a piece of string around a leg, take a picture, make a few phone calls and gets great press coverage, very clever. (if that's not accusing me, I don't know what is?)
There is no real evidence how this fox died, just theories which suit some peoples agenda.
NAME AND ADDRESS SUPPLIED

AND MY REPLY...
Sir,

I had a two weeks of hell after finding the little fox in the Clogaenog forest and so the suggestion (Letters, June 24th) that I fantasised by deliberately tying up the leg of a fox for publicity, is sick and nasty! It's like rubbing salt in an already gaping wound.  It bothers me that someone could stoop so low to write such a cruel accusation? Obviously one that thinks foxes deserve being cruelly abused.

Plus why would I still be going to the trouble of putting up posters (weekly) around the area where she was found. Posters that are being systematically removed close the village of Llanfairhangl, even though they remain intact in other area's of the forest.

And surely I would have come up a huge reward instead of the £1,000 being offered. I may be many things, but a liar I'm not! Plus a liar always gets found out! People must think that being a campaigner I must have become hardened to the cruelty, but it still tears me apart to this day. It's why I still campaign with such vigour and without funds to help me. I give up my time and money to help animals that are being unfairly treated and abused. If anonymous wants verification about the murdered fox, then he/she should contact RSPCA Inspector Fred Armstrong who saw the body, or contact Police Wildlife Officer Mike Butlin from North Wales Police who has been in charge of the case. The police are in possession of the rope and this little vixen's remains have now been laid to rest, with respect.
Oh and by the way, I think a CSI who was there at the time this vixen was discovered would have more idea about how this little fox died than some nasty, snidy, pro-hunt supporter who was not even there! don't you?
Whoever was responsible for the torture of this fox is clearly a sadist and a coward, and I am neither.  However, the anonymous correspondent who inferred that I would stoop to staging such a stunt for publicity is certainly the latter, if not the former. 

Anyone with information can email me with information in confidence - waac@rocketmail.com 
And please check my website
www.walesagainstanimalcruelty.org.uk  if the public want to see clear photo's of this little fox, they can find them on WAAC's Latest News page.

Yours Faithfully,

Judi Hewitt

THE FORESTRY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO JUDI HEWITT'S COMPLAINT REGARDING A MUTILATED VIXEN FOUND IN THE CLOGAENOG FOREST.

22nd June 2010

   

Dear Mrs Hewitt

 

Complaint about maladministration by a member of Forestry Commission Wales' Staff

 

I refer to your three e-mails of 26th May 2010: the first sent to me, an amended version and a variant (in the form of a complaint) both sent via our website enquiry system.

 

I am the Local Area Manager for the Hiraethog Area that includes Clocaenog Forest.  I was on annual leave at the time of your original enquiry and you were accordingly referred to our Forest Supervisor, Irwin Ellis.  As Irwin’s line manager, I am responding to your complaint as outlined in our letter (by e-mail) from Julia Lloyd, Complaints Recording Officer 27th May 2010.

 

I understand from your correspondence that you thought that a forester could be involved in animal cruelty/wildlife crime related to the dead fox you found near an entrance to Clocaenog Forest and that when you made this suggestion to Irwin he either became angry or threatened legal action.

 

I have subsequently carried out an interview with Irwin, as part of our internal investigation.  Irwin had a good recollection of your conversation and recalled that he asked you for clarification as to whether you were accusing a forester of involvement in animal cruelty/wildlife crime and clearly remembers you saying you were not but that you suspected this.  He remembers informing you that because of your suspicions he would need to escalate this further up the management chain as any suggestion that staff could be involved in illegal activity would need a proper and full investigation.

 

Forestry Commission Wales (FCW) has not been able to examine the fox so I can offer no comment on the likelihood of it being subjected to animal cruelty/wildlife crime, nor of it having been set upon by dogs.  Irwin remembers trying to explain what may have happened to the fox.  He also remembers discussing the exemption in the Hunting Act 2004 that allows a maximum of two dogs to be used for flushing foxes to guns.  Irwin recalls that you questioned why FCW allows hunting to take place under the exempt hunting provisions and he explained that this is considered necessary to control fox population levels for the purpose of preventing or reducing serious damage, which they would otherwise cause to livestock.

 

FCW as a public body operates in an unbiased wayand only allows exempt hunting through the issue and monitoring of exempt hunting licences to hunts that are affiliated members of the Federation of Welsh Packs or who can comply with the principal requirements of the Master Agreement between FCW and the Federation.

 

Irwin is FCWs lead contact for any of the FCW permitted hunts and farmers around Clocaenog Forest and he does know many of them well.  He would have a good knowledge of their integrity in relation to hunting and is responsible for monitoring legal exempt hunting activities on our land.  Irwin has been involved in fox hunting in the past and has followed fox hunting in the Conwy Valley on many occasions.  He does not own any dogs and does not bring a dog to work.  He was talking to you on a hands free unit from his van with the window open and it is therefore possible that you heard dogs barking in the background, as there are many farms with dogs around the forest.  I have asked Irwin about his reference to the baler twine used on the fox’s leg and he explained to me that once a fox has been shot, rope/string/baler twine etc is sometimes used to carry the fox away.

 

From my investigations I have been unable to identify any evidence of maladministration in this instance.  I am truly sorry that you had the unhappy experience of finding the dead fox and can understand how distressing it was for you.  I have asked Irwin and all local area staff to be extra vigilant in their travels around the forest and to report any suspicious behaviour or dead animals they may find.  I hope this reassures you.  Please do get in touch with me if your own monitoring reveals anything untoward.

 

If you are dissatisfied with this response or feel that it is inaccurate or insufficient, you are entitled to request a further review by writing to Steve Cresswell, Forest District Manager steve.cresswell@forestry.gov.uk within one month of the date of this letter.  You should set out clearly why you are not satisfied with this response.

 

Yours sincerely

 
Steve Crosby

Local Area Manager - Hiraethog

Coed y Gororau Forest District



MY REPLY TO FORESTRY COMMISSION WALES.

Hi Steve,
I've spoken with a few people with knowledge of Welsh Packs and they know
nothing about foxes being tied up after being shot to remove them. In fact
they laughed at the suggestion that a gun pack would bother to tie up the
leg of a fox. One of my colleague's who has worked undercover with a notorious pack in
Mid Wales to gather evidence of cruelty has said he has never heard of this
happening to a fox.
I had a forensic examiner with me when I found the fox and his thoughts were that this
vixen showed no signs of having been shot, but there was substantial
evidence that she had been tied down and attacked by dogs. The two loops at
the end of the twine was also proof that she had been tied down. If she had been
attacked by a pack, then she would have incurred injuries to her upper
body. Another point worth mentioning is that the bloodied injuries to her
lower body and tied up leg showed signs of her having been alive when she
was attacked. If she had been predated on after death, there would have been
no blood spatter and she would have had chunks taken from her whole body. As
it was, she looked perfect apart from the awful injuries to her under belly
and back leg. The tied up leg was undamaged, apart from where the rope had
been tied.
I attach a couple of photo's of the little vixen I found. These photo's were
taken the day after we found her remains. The RSPCA met with us in the
forest and concurred with us that it looked like she had been tied down and
set upon by working/hunting dogs.
Another concern for me is that gun packs are useless without a pack, so how
can hunts be successful using just two dogs? In the words of a gun pack
pre-ban, using two dogs to flush to guns is completely useless! It's like
looking for a needle in a haystack. But to use a pack in a forest area would
also split the pack.
At the end of the day, I am very concerned that cruelty is being allowed to
happen in the Clogaenog/Hiraethog area and so I will be taking my video
camera out with me every time I venture into parts of this forest.
I'm not one for quitting as anyone who knows me will tell you. This little
fox died a horrible death and the sick people who did this are still out
there ready to do this again. It turns my stomach that evil is being allowed
to get away with it, and worse, possibly have the blessing of some in the
forestry!. And as for fox predation, I'm staggered that FCW are still
allowing hunting with dogs (even two dogs??) when far more lambs die as a
result of dog attacks and bad husbandry every year, than by any fox. Out of
475 farms across the whole of Wales that were surveyed (a few years ago)
about fox predation - in four years, only thirteen lambs were thought to
have succumbed to fox predation. Says it all really! Any excuse for some
people to kill for fun.
Sincerely,
Judi Hewitt

Note - Strange that the FCW state that they operate in an unbiased way, yet gives a former fox hunter (not repented) the job of over seeing fox hunting in the area. It's a bit like putting a paedophile in charge of children! Plus if this fox had been hunted out of season, then why did the FCW not mention this in their letter to me? Hunts are supposed to give times and dates to the Forestry before embarking on a fox killing spree, and so I would have thought the Commission would have known if any hunting had been allowed on Forestry land.
And let's not forget that the majority of the British public abhor fox hunting, so you may ask, why is this government funded organisation still supporting obscene cruelty?
 

 PRESS RELEASE    for immediate release [3-5-10]                 

From Protect Our Wild Animals associate, Alan Kirby, M.Sc

Hunters and their friends have poured millions into Tory coffers, says anti-hunting campaigner

 STATEMENT TO PRESS Research by Protect Our Wild Animals [POWA] associate, Alan Kirby, has revealed that millions of pounds of donations to the Conservative Party have come from active hunters, hunt members and strong supporters of hunting. Mr. Kirby claims that his ongoing research has already identified around £4.25 million of donations from such people since the Electoral Commission Register for Party donations was set up in January 2001. More than half of this has been given since David Cameron became leader in December 2005. The figures do not include any donations in first quarter 2010, details of which are not yet published. Mr. Kirby said, ‘Several senior Conservatives clearly have a personal passion for hunting:- Mr. Cameron himself, Nick Herbert, his Shadow Environment Secretary [a former Master of a hare hunt], William Hague, Edward Garnier, James Gray, Nicholas Soames and others. Unsurprisingly, all of Cameron’s Shadow Cabinet appointees, and the vast majority of Tory PPCs, favour repeal of the Hunting Act 2004.  But one must ask to what extent the sheer scale of the donations the Party has received from hunters and hunt supporters might also help account for its apparently irrational commitment to pander to the wishes of a tiny and widely-disliked minority.’  A large proportion of the donations have come from people associated with the Heythrop Fox Hounds, based in David Cameron’s constituency, with which the Conservative leader has close associations.   He added ‘Mr. Cameron’s favourite Hunt has had several of its followers convicted or cautioned in recent years for attacking or menacing hunt monitors. Their huntsman was facing charges of illegal hunting until the CPS dropped the suit after a High Court ruling made it extraordinarily difficult to prove a case against an organised hunt. Mr. Cameron has been reported as suggesting that the Hunting Act was being widely flouted, but has not been heard condemning the alleged law-breakers. Nor did he publicly criticise the 50,000 hunt supporters claimed by the Countryside Alliance to have pledged to break any law banning hunting wild mammals with dogs before the Act was passed. The Heythrop also appears to be part of the nationwide Vote OK operation, which enlists and helps organise hunters to campaign, in ‘plain clothes’, for pro-hunting candidates – nearly always Tories - in marginal constituencies held by anti-hunt candidates. Mr. Cameron’s home Hunt are believed to be targeting Parmjit Dhanda, the Labour incumbent in Gloucester.’  Mr. Kirby also said ‘The Conservative manifesto pledge of a government Bill to repeal the Hunting Act confirmed that Mr. Cameron and the Tory leadership are intent on restoring the cruelty and havoc of unfettered hunting of wild mammals with dogs for ‘sport’, though they’ve mostly been strangely reluctant to mention or debate the subject during the election campaign. Despite polls showing that large majorities of both Tory voters and rural dwellers want the ban kept, they mean to reward their hunter friends by sweeping away a highly popular Act which inconveniences and affronts them.’  He continued, ‘I have been able to uncover, in my spare time, this scale of donations from pro-hunters via little more than one Hunt’s subscriber and donor list, which someone ‘left on a bus’, and Google. Goodness knows how much of the Tory Party’s funds would be seen to come from fans of live quarry hunting if I’d had access to such lists for all 300 UK Hunts, or how much might lie undiscovered in donations by companies that have no obvious connection to hunters.  Mr. Kirby concluded, ‘Dr. Brian May, the astrophysicist, Queen guitarist and force behind the new SaveMe campaign, recently wrote- ‘… if Cameron is allowed by the voters to form a government, this country will effectively be governed by the Countryside Alliance.’ This is perhaps only a slight exaggeration. Certainly it would be a disaster for many of our nation’s wild animals, mark a triumph and reward for those who refuse to respect the law and the democratic process, associate the Conservative Party in decent people’s minds with a reversion to cruelty and barbarism for years to come, and diminish our country’s moral standing.” END OF STATEMENT TO PRESS   Digest of discovered donations follows below.              Supporting details available on request. 

The largest donors who appear to be associated with the Heythrop Fox Hounds are:- 

 ·         Robert [aka Robin] Fleming   Total donations £294,000.  Seems to be regarded as the head of the Fleming family. Lives in Oxfordshire, where he and his wife are one of four Fleming households to subscribe to the Heythrop. He is a serial donor to the Conservative Party, especially to David Cameron’s constituency, Witney. This is part of the Heythrop Fox Hound’s country. Mr. Fleming also apparently gave £10,000 to David Cameron’s Tory leadership campaign fund. ·         Roderick [Roddy] Fleming   Brother of Robert/Robin.  Total donations £224,000.  A leading supporter of the Heythrop, Roddy has reportedly also made large donations to the Countryside Alliance. Has been the largest shareholder in the financial business Fleming Family and Partners and is said to have a private tax haven in Liechtenstein. Reportedly also a large donor to the Countryside Alliance [at least £100k + a £75k loan],  and to be a close associate of David Cameron’s in Witney constituency.  

The Fleming family also own an 80,000 acre Scottish estate, where deer stalking and gamebird shooting are promoted.

 

·         Sir Anthony Bamford, head of JCB, with £86,500 in personal donations but a further £1,128,000 through his company. Family mansion in Oxfordshire. His wife, Lady Carol, is a donor to the Heythrop Hunt. His brother, Mark and his son Joseph have both made huge personal donations to the Conservatives [totalling £1.6 million], but, as I have not been able to firmly establish that they are hunt supporters, this figure is not included in the totals.

 

·         David and Susanna Peake. Donations exceed £26,000.  Both are donors to, and known strong supporters, of the Heythrop. David has been Chairman of the nearby Christchurch and Farley Hill Beagles, a hare hunt, since 1992. In 2003, The League Against Cruel Sports accused the Heythrop of using artificial earths and feeding foxes, including on land owned or in the trusteeship of the Peakes.

 

·         Simon Keswick, the business tycoon, has donated just under £100,000. Former Chair of KwikSave, now a Director of Jardine Matheson and several other companies, including Fleming Mercantile Trust. His wife is a subscriber to the Heythrop.

 

Other Heythrop subscribers or donors have given at least £27,000 between them to the Conservatives, making a total of almost £1.7 million. Some have also made contributions to David Cameron’s campaign to be elected Tory leader in 2005.  These amounts are not included in the totals here.

  

Beyond the Heythrop Hunt, the brothers of Heythrop donor Simon Keswick have also made substantial personal donations to the Conservative Party:-

 ·         Sir Henry Keswick, and his wife, Tessa, are believed to be supporters of the Tedworth FH in Wiltshire. Their joint donations total £241,000. Sir Henry, the Chairman of Jardine Matheson, now also represents the pro stag-hunting group FONT on the National Trust’s ruling council. They are also believed to be keen game bird shooters.  

·         Sir Chippendale [‘Chips’] Keswick, former Director of Hambros Bank, is a strong hunting supporter, and has given nearly £35,000. In 1999 his name reportedly appeared on a mysterious chain letter, along with 100 other rich and powerful people, which the Independent claimed was part of an attempt to rig opinion polls to look as if the public did not want hunting banned.

 

Jardine Matheson, the company of which Sir Henry is Chairman and Simon Keswick is a Director, has been accused by Wetlands International of ‘environmental vandalism’ in Indonesia in connection with rain forest clearance for palm oil plantations by a J.M. subsidiary, AAL.

  

Active and formerly active hunters themselves have also contributed mightily to the Tory books:-

 

·         Johan Christofferson, a Norwegian American hedge fund manager, has given almost £250,000, personally or through the UK arm of his company. Christofferson Robb. He is the Joint Master [JM] of the Jedforest Fox Hounds [FH]. When JM of the Isle of Wight FH, he was reprimanded by the Master of Foxhounds Association for failing to prevent his Huntsman and a supporter, who is now their terrierman, from staging a carcass-dumping stunt in Brighton when the Labour Conference was on., which caused great public outrage there and for which they were convicted. That Huntsman, Stuart Trousdale, is now Christofferson’s Huntsman and fellow JM at the Jedforest FH. Christofferson has directed £40,000 to the constituency being fought for the Tories by Simon Hart, CEO of the Countryside Alliance [Carmarthen West], which the strongly anti-hunt Nick Ainger is defending for Labour. Christofferson also reportedly made donations to David Cameron’s leadership campaign and Nick Herbert’s private office [both £5,000]. These sums are not included in the totals above. 

 

·         The Samworth family. Until his retirement a few years ago, Sir David Samworth was head of the Samworth Brothers meat products firm. He is a former Chairman of the Quorn FH and JM of the Cottesmore FH, and has donated nearly £56,000. He appears to have been a substantial Tory donor for longer than the Register has existed. Sir David’s wife was also a JM of the Cottesmore FH. Sir David’s son Mark, now in charge of the family business, donated £125,000 in April 2010.

 

·         Lord Peter Daresbury,  Director of numerous companies, with a large Cheshire estate, is Joint Master of the Sir Watkins Williams-Wynn FH. He has contributed £53,000. Daresbury is a former Chairman of the Master of Foxhounds Association [MFHA]. In 2004, a leaked email revealed that he had been castigated by Simon Hart, CEO of the Countryside Alliance, after Daresbury had apparently written to Hunt chairmen urging them to ask their local farmers to help more foxes breed so they’d have plenty to hunt. Daresbury has contributed to the Conservative constituency funds of Carmarthen West, where Simon Hart is Tory PPC.

 

·         The Vestey family.  Sir Edmund Vestey, another former MFHA Chairman, who died in 2007, had donated over £50,000 of his own money between 2001 and then. He was a Master of the Thurlow FH for more than 40 years. Hunting remains a family passion. Mr. and  Mrs. R.J.Vestey are now JMs of the Thurlow FH and Sir Edmund’s son Tim, is a JM of the neighbouring Puckeridge FH. A Vestey-family owned shipping company, Star Reefers, made donations totalling £73,500 to the Conservative Party in 2008 and 2009. In the 1990s, the League Against Cruel Sports claimed to have strong evidence that artificial earths for foxes had been constructed in Thurlow hunt country and that food was sometimes put out for them.

 

·         Sir John Craven actually lists ‘hunting’ among his recreations in ‘Who’s Who’, scorning the usual ‘country pursuits’ euphemism. He has donated £26,000. He was Chairman of Lonmin plc [formerly Lonrho] until he retired last year. He appears to have his country seat at Tetbury, Gloucs, but it is not known which pack he hunts with. However, as he is now Chairman of Fleming Family and Partners, he is presumably close to the Fleming brothers [qv], who are subscribers to the Heythrop.

·         Oliver Hemsley, a former JM of the Cattistock FH in Dorset, and CEO of the finance group Numis, gave £25,000 in 2008. Mr. Hemsley was, reportedly, once accused by a fellow hunter of causing the death of one of his horses, and injury to another, by over-furious riding.

 

·         James Haigh, MBE, Chairman of the Rockwood Harriers in West Yorkshire, has contributed £5,000.

 

·         Mark Andreae, the Joint Master of the Hampshire FH since 1991, has been comparatively stingy, contributing just £4,200. He is a wealthy farmer who used to own the magnificent Moundsmere Manor in the Hunt country. He sold this to a Tory mega-donor, Sir Irvine Laidlaw [£3 million +] in 2005. The Hampshire met there while Andreae was owner, and may have continued to do so. However, Mr. Laidlaw, a Monaco tax exile, has apparently not lived there. As I’ve been unable to confirm him as a hunt supporter, his giant donations are not included in my totals.

  

Aristocratic hunters and strong hunt supporters have been identified as contributing generously to Conservative funds, though the multiple different names they tend to use may have caused some to be overlooked:-

 

¨       Lord Alexander Hesketh is the 3rd Baron Hesketh, and a former Tory Party Treasurer. He used to have his own Formula 1 team and motorcycle manufacturing company. His donations total £289,000. Educated at Ampleforth, which has an in-house hare-hunting pack, he comes from a family with deep hunting roots. He was the owner of Easton Neston house, with a very large estate, in Northamptonshire, until selling it in 2006.  He regularly played host to the Grafton FH. In 2002, the Telegraph reported that he and his butler had grappled with and removed a hunt saboteur who had gatecrashed the meet outside the house.

 

¨       The Rothschild family also have deep hunting roots, both here and on the continent. Between them they have donated £370,000 to the Conservative Party since 2001. The family had their own stag hunting pack in Buckinghamshire until at least the second decade of the 20th century. I have been able to discover little about actual participation in hunting of any of the present British side of the family. However, the Bicester FH meet regularly at Waddesdon Manor, one of the Rothschild seats now owned in part by the National Trust, and hunt the Rothschild-owned Eythorpe Park adjacent to the house.  In addition to the personal donations by family members, in 2005 Lady Victoria de Rothschild loaned the Party over £1 million, through a specially created non-trading company, possibly to try to keep the loan’s real source anonymous. This was legal at the time. Kate Rothschild, who has donated £5000, is married to Benjamin Goldsmith, the brother of Zak, of whom more below.

 

¨       Lady Charlotte Townshend, another former JM of the Cattistock FH, and her husband James, appear to have given almost £50,000 between them.  Lady Townshend is one of Britain’s richest women, with a 15,000 acre Dorset estate and ownership of a large chunk of West London. The Dorset property includes Chesil Beach and, in 1999, she reportedly scuppered a proposed agreement that it should become a National Nature Reserve because the Government was threatening to ban hunting.

 

¨       Quentin Wallop, the Earl of Portsmouth, a self-avowed hunt supporter associated with the Hampshire FH, has stumped up nearly £70,000.

 

¨       The Duke of Buccleuch has a fox hunt bearing his name in Scotland. Buccleuch Estates have contributed over £40,000 since 2004.

 

¨       Ralph Percy, Duke of Northumberland,  has, according to current Electoral Commission records, donated just £2,500, but the Observer claimed in 2008 that he had given £50,000 in the third quarter [not included in totals above as I cannot find it in the Electoral Commission records]. The Percy FH was founded by the Duke’s family and Lady Victoria Percy is a current JM. It’s Chairman, Charles Bucknall, has donated £2,500. In 2005, 14 mounted hunters from the Percy FH were branded ‘reckless and dangerous’ by the police after they broke away from a procession through Alnwick and galloped through the town centre causing fear and alarm among residents and shoppers.

 

¨       Sir Reginald Sheffield, [Samantha Cameron’s father], is a Baronet who owns two huge country estates. A well known supporter of hunting, he has contributed over £14,000 to his local constituency party, Brigg & Goole, in recent years.

 

¨       Charles Pelham, the Earl of Yarborough is a Master of the Brocklesby FH in Lincolnshire, has given more than £4,000.

  

Three ‘celebrity’ hunt supporters have made substantial donations :- 

 

·         Frederick Forsyth, the novelist.  An outspoken supporter of hunting, he was a celebrity participant in the ‘Countryside March’ of 2002. His donations total nearly £65,000.

 ·         Sir Tim Rice, the lyricist, another hunting supporter and participant in the Countryside March, has donated over £35,000. He lambasted journalist Rod Liddle for attacking the Countryside marchers, saying, among other things ‘The real elitists in modern Britain are not rural hunting folk but the sophisticated metropolitan nexus… ‘ and also wrote ‘I believe the proposed ban is a serious threat to liberty’. 

·         Zak Goldsmith, currently Conservative PPC for Richmond Park. Although formerly a member of the Green Party, whose policy has always been strongly anti-hunt, Goldsmith has made his pro-hunt sentiments clear since switching to the Tories. One of the heirs to billionaire Sir Edward Goldsmith’s vast fortune, he has donated £330,000 in total. Goldsmith’s brother, Benjamin, who is married to Kate Rothschild, has made smaller, though substantial, donations also, but his attitude to hunting is not known for certain and thus they are not included.

 
 

CAVEAT:  the author has made reasonable endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the information above and drawn on sources believed by him to be reliable. He is as certain as he can be that the donations ascribed to the persons above are accurate in amounts and did come from the persons above identified. He cannot, however, be entirely certain that all of the personal details [relationships, etc] are completely correct and wholly contemporary. No wrongdoing by the persons identified above is imputed as regards the donations. Where public domain allegations made against any of them in the past are reported above, the author believes that, though some of these may have been denied, he is unaware of any of them having been refuted.

 _________________________________________________________

 

Alan Kirby M.Sc, Protect Our Wild Animals [POWA] associate  3-5-10

 

Contact details;  Telephone;-  07972257467     email:   alank24@tesco.net

 

POWA website:  www.powa.org.uk Edit Text